get a 21 F3.5. Its cute and gives really nice shots.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernard Frangoulis" <bernard.frangoulis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] 17mm's
> At 13:37 09/05/2003 -0700, you wrote:
> >18, 21, 24, 28 and 35mm are actually pretty well spaced, with noticeable
> >differences in perspective and coverage. If using 'sneaker framing' of
> >nearby subjects, they certainly overlap in coverage, but the image can
> >differ quite a bit. If there is background at any distance, its relation
> >to the foreground shifts. I know it may be heresy, but the Vivitar
> >S1/Phoenix/?? 19-35/3.5-4.5, in addition to being optically very good, is
> >an interesting way to experience perspective differences over the wide to
> >super wide angle range. It's quite an inexpensive way to find out which
> >focal lengths one prefers in that range.
>
>
> Yes, I considered it, but it appears to be quite a large lens - and I do
> like a lot my 24/2.8 Zuiko. I prefer to get another wide(sr)-angle lens to
> complement it.
>
> Bernard
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|