Hi Skip,
You are a bit unlucky (or lucky if you have not spend a buck on DC), I
bought my E-10 two years ago because I have seen so many good digital
photos, this were linked by the contributors of rec.photo.digital, I was
spending extensive time here in arguing digital is not as good as film. But
on the other hand, the quality of pictures really inspire me. Below is just
a few examples, I'm so regret I haven't bookmark all the beautiful DC sites,
I have seen some studio works that were just impressive!
http://photography-on-the.net/gallery/list.php?exhibition=2
http://www.belgiumdigital.com/
http://www.animalu.com/pics/photos.htm
Below is link I think most of you know, it may only contain test photo so
don't complain, but it shows many test photos of DC so that you see how a DC
perform.
http://www.dpreview.com/gallery/
Are they really bad? Of course if you insist on showing bad sample site
there must be many, not only DC but film users too.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> My rant might not "get to the heart of the discussion", but IMO, it's
still
> valid. Rather than arguing whether the Contax Zeiss or Nikon Nikkor
optics
> are the best, now the gearheads are arguing whether 11MgPx is enough. Or
> whether the latest whizbang digital camera feature produces the best
color,
> or, or....
>
> I've seen few web galleries from new digital shooters that I've been
> impressed with. They should take a beginning photo course first and learn
> HOW.....
>
> Where is the line between film and digital? Blurry, that's where.
>
>
> Skip
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|