I think the reason most people do not discuss these other problems while talking
about Digital Vs. Film is that they are not issues peculiar to the way the
different technologies work
Bad lighting will give you a bad pic regardless of your medium.
I can see making a case for camera shake, because digital doesn't have film
transport, but this only applies to motorized film rigs.
So, while what you say is true, it doesn't get to the heart of the discussion.
What are the diffences between film and digital, where is the line, how far can
you push what, and so on...
P.s. There is a forest, right behind this tree, I know it! ;-)
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 14:13:32 -0500
From: "om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [OM] Res wars continue
Soap box out=2E=2E=2E=2E=2E=2ERead only if you don't mind an opinion=2E=2E=
=2E=2E=2E=2E
Too many people worry about resolving power, contrast lines per mm,
Modular-Transfer-Function graphs, grain size, SQF evaluations, RF vs=2E SL=
R,
Snip....
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|