Yes, you are right, when the topic is digital vs film we should stick
on it, otherwise it will be the war of the DC on your hand is better
than the Zuikos on my hand, your Zuiko's pictures is better than my
Zuikos pictures... etc. The combinations are too complicated to
discuss here :-)
C.H.Ling
bsandyman@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> I think the reason most people do not discuss these other problems while
> talking
> about Digital Vs. Film is that they are not issues peculiar to the way the
> different technologies work
>
> Bad lighting will give you a bad pic regardless of your medium.
>
> I can see making a case for camera shake, because digital doesn't have film
> transport, but this only applies to motorized film rigs.
>
> So, while what you say is true, it doesn't get to the heart of the discussion.
> What are the diffences between film and digital, where is the line, how far
> can
> you push what, and so on...
>
> P.s. There is a forest, right behind this tree, I know it! ;-)
>
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|