ML Archive: [OM] Kodak Emulsion Juggling

Subject:	[OM] Kodak Emulsion Juggling
From:	Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 11 Dec 2002 16:50:44 -0800

Apparently Supra and Royal Gold are being replaced by Royal Suprawith 200 ISO as the slow speed.

--
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, (continued) Re: [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, Steve Goss Re: [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, iwert Re: [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, tOM Trottier RE: [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Re: [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, John and Julie Ockman RE: [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, Timpe, Jim Re: [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Re: [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, iwert *[OT] LIA - Was [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, Julian Davies* Re: [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, Winsor Crosby [OM] Kodak Emulsion Juggling, Winsor Crosby <= Re: [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, Richard F. Man Re: [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Re: [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Re: [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, John and Julie Ockman Re: [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, John Hudson Re: [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Re: [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, Jim Brokaw Re: [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Which OM body?, Julian Davies
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Which OM body?, NSURIT
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, Winsor Crosby
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Zuiko 50/ vs Noctilux again, Richard F. Man
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Olympus-OM

[OM] Kodak Emulsion Juggling