| Subject: | Re: [OM] 35-70/3.6 vs 50/1.2 |
|---|---|
| From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 7 Dec 2002 14:48:21 -0800 |
The 35-70 might do the same thing if it could open up past 3.6! Paul But it can't open up past 3.6 which means it is well designed to its parameters. And the whole point of exotic glass and design is to allow you to get a decent image at wider apertures. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM vs. Leica, Richard F. Man |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] predecessor of the 40/2, Richard F. Man |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 35-70/3.6 vs 50/1.2, C.H.Ling |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 35-70/3.6 vs 50/1.2, C.H.Ling |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |