----- Original Message -----
From: <ll.clark@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] 35-70/3.6 vs 50/1.2
> In <004e01c29d98$bfcd7c60$8b8acdd1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, on 12/06/02
> at 08:31 PM, "Paul D. Farrar" <farrar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>
> >Make sure your browser isn't set to scale graphics to the window (newer
> >IEs have that as default), so you can get the actual pixels. It's
> >really obvious on my system.
>
> Do you mean the option for "Enable automatic picture resizing"? It's not
> checked in my system. If not, where else might I find it? [IE 6]
...
That's what was thinking of. It really makes a mess of some graphics.
I'm not sure if there's something else. On my browser, if you look at the
images of out-of-focus light points in 5070.jpg, like on the far left, they
clearly show as dim discs with a bright edge. Branches are almost split
into double images, and leaves have a streaky look. On 3570.jpg, the
distant light points, such as from the water on the rocks, are more like
blobs of light, and the background looks blurred, rather than streaky.
Paul Farrar
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|