One of the reason is the file will be more optimized for sharing in
the net. At the mean time 3000dpi is good enough for most application,
especially it is sample down from 4000dpi, the resolution is much
better than my old 2700dpi scanner (LS2000).
C.H.Ling
Tal Lancaster wrote:
>
> On Mon, 09 Dec 2002 11:06:38 +0800
> "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > The film is Fuji Provia F100 (RDP III). It is the least grain slide
> > film currently. The scanner is Nikon LS4000ED scanned at 3000dpi.
> >
> >
>
> Any reason you prefer to scan at 3000dpi instead of 4000?
>
> Tal
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|