The Scan Elite will probably have 3.6, now I think of it. However,
since, as I understand it, there is no agreed standard for measuring
Dynamic Range, I am not sure how valid is a comparison.
Chris
At 20:50 +0000 29/10/02, suchismit@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Also,have you considered the Canon FS400US ? Though its
high on pixels its a little short on Dynamic range (3.4
vs Nikon's 3.6)
If you want to hear more good things about the Nikon,
CH Ling will be happy to tell you all about his
LS4000 :)
--
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
?
+44 (0)7092 251126
mailto:imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
... a nascent photo library.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|