| Subject: | Re: Re: [OM] Film Scanners | 
|---|---|
| From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
| Date: | Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:01:45 +1100 | 
| > Matt Crawley <matt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There may be other diffs too... Light source is a VERY important one > especially if you plan to scan negs. Do you plan on scanning mostly > negs or > slides? Hopefully some list members will have more specific info for So what's the story here ? Why is the light source more important for negs than transparencies ? Wayne Harridge http://members.optusnet.com.au/~w_harridge < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Film Scanners, Matt Crawley | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Film Scanners, Tom Murphy | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Film Scanners, Chris Barker | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Film Scanners, Matt Crawley | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |