----- Original Message -----
From: "Olaf Greve" <o.greve@xxxxxxx>
>
> Interesting, I perceive the quality of the Colorplan as really high.
>
Actually it is not bad, but there could be something that is much better ;-)
I found it out in a test slide I took with Zuiko 50/3.5 at F5.6 it can
resolve to 70lp/mm with microscope but with projection I need to move the
projector back to my bed room and project out to the wall at living room to
enlarge the image to over 100 inches to see the lines.
>
> I have no experience with that one either.
>
Just dig out the archival, the lens Gary used was Kodak Ektanar C 102mm
f/2.8 with blue lettering.
>
> Either way, I thought that quality-wise there was not much between the
> regular Colorplan and the Super Colorplan, but price-wise I believe the
> latter is quite a bit more expensive.
>
Yes, the Super Colorplan here is around US$200 new, double the price of
Colorplan.
> Has anyone done some side to side comparisons of these two lenses, and/or
> perhaps in comparison of the Kodak lens you mention as well?
>
Some months ago my friend told me he has ordered the Super Colorplan, but I
never has chance to see his lens and make a comparison.
C.H.Ling
> Cheers!
> Olafo
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|