| Subject: | Re: [OM] film death watch |
|---|---|
| From: | Dirk Wright <wright@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 09 Jan 2001 09:05:39 -0500 |
> >Now that's a potentially scary thought. What if speed and cost aren't the >only >reasons? >What if Fuji and others are now going to intentionally lower the processing >quality of their film/print processors to accelerate the belief in the masses >(us) >that digital quality has already surpassed film quality? I think that the film and digital imaging parts of the company are typically separate sub-entities. I'm mostly sure the top manager of the film division would fight this to the death, since it is his profits and job that are on the line..... -- Be Seeing You. Dirk Wright < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Will high-capacity batteries harm my flash?, Scott Nelson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Filters for the 24 2.8, frieder . faig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] film death watch, C.H.Ling |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] film death watch, John Hudson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |