Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] TRI-X or T-MAX 400

from Terry and Tracey

Subject:	Re: [OM] TRI-X or T-MAX 400
From:	"Terry and Tracey" <foxcroft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 26 Jan 2000 21:33:57 +1100

> I strongly suspect Kodak is trying to cook up a response to all this,
> as evidenced by their very recent cancellation of their Kodachrome 25
> & 64 lines.

What! Kodachrome is no more? Please elaborate.

Foxy


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] TRI-X or T-MAX 400, Michael P. Dodson Re: [OM] TRI-X or T-MAX 400, John Pendley Re: [OM] TRI-X or T-MAX 400, Christopher Biggs Re: [OM] TRI-X or T-MAX 400, John Pendley Re: [OM] TRI-X or T-MAX 400, John A. Prosper Re: [OM] TRI-X or T-MAX 400, John Pendley Re: [OM] TRI-X or T-MAX 400, John A. Prosper Re: [OM] TRI-X or T-MAX 400, george [OM] Ilfochromes, Ilfocolour and Crystal Archive, Giles Re: [OM] TRI-X or T-MAX 400, Terry and Tracey <= Kodachrome 25; was Re: [OM] TRI-X or T-MAX 400, John A. Prosper Re: [OM] TRI-X or T-MAX 400, Giles Re: [OM] TRI-X or T-MAX 400, Windrim, Brian Re: [OM] TRI-X or T-MAX 400, John A. Prosper

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: Ebay Scams and persoanl attacks, Barks
Next by Date:	[OM] Zuiko 50mm f 1.4 Optical Formula., Ángel Lobo
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Ilfochromes, Ilfocolour and Crystal Archive, Giles
Next by Thread:	Kodachrome 25; was Re: [OM] TRI-X or T-MAX 400, John A. Prosper
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]