Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] TRI-X or T-MAX 400

Subject: Re: [OM] TRI-X or T-MAX 400
From: "John A. Prosper" <prosper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 22:12:10 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, John Pendley wrote:

|John P.
|We have the same initials!  To change the course of this thread a bit, I'd 
like to deal with a
|more basic question.  All my serious photography has been in B&W, and some 
years ago.  I burned
|out, then slowly crept back in using color, since I no longer had a darkroom.  
I shot color neg
|material.  The I started shooting Velvia, etc. fairly recently.  My impression 
is that Cibas
|made from transparencies are far better than anything I ever got from any 
print film.  Pricey,
|though.  Actually, I did experiment a little with Ciba when I had my darkroom, 
so I know I
|could do it again.  Do you agree that Cibas are the best color prints?

They are the best I've seen.  However, I'm not the best to ask since I
am mostly a slide guy.  I only take color prints when I or a friend
wants portraits.  There are alternative color printing processes out
there which I have not sampled yet.



|John A. Prosper wrote:
|
|> On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, John Pendley wrote:
|>
|> |
|> |
|> |Christopher Biggs wrote:
|> |
|> |> John Pendley <jpendley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> moved upon the face of the 'Net and 
spake thusly:
|> |>
|> |> > For B&W, it used to be Tri-X all the way--in HC110, 1 to 31.  I've been 
out
|> |> > of it for awhile, so don't know about T-MAX.  A lot of people seem to 
like
|> |> > it.  But I got beautiful 11x14's with Tri-X, processed right.
|> |>
|> |> T-Max does magic with grain structure to give finer grain at the same
|> |> speed.   The hidden cost is that it's less "tolerant" of exposure and
|> |> processing variations.  Some people consider that the T-Max films are
|> |> best left for the studio where everything is under perfect control,
|> |> while Tri-X still rules in the field.
|> |>
|> |> > As for color, you can't beat Velvia.
|> |>
|> |> But not for people, and certainly not indoors!
|> |>
|> |> A low contrast portrait film like Kodak Portra or Fuji NPH is
|> |> indicated for that application.
|> |
|> |Hi, Christopher,
|> |Thanks for the feedback, especially re: Tri-X.  I'd have spotted the 
limitations of Velvia
|> |if I shot people, or if I shot indoors.  (Actually, I do, but usually with 
a Stylus and
|> |print film.)  But almost all my "serious" stuff is landscapes/nature, etc.  
I have tried
|> |the new Ektachrome 100VS.  It's terrific, and faster, but it hasn't yet won 
me over from
|> |Velvia.  Given the difference in color rendition between the two, it'll 
probably end up
|> |being a matter of choosing one or the other based on application.
|> |John
|>
|> For portrait photographic prints, try Agfa's Portrait 160, Fuji NGS
|> 160, or Kodak Portra.  Both Fuji and Kodak also market 400 ISO
|> versions of these films.  For portrait transparencies, try Fuji Astia
|> or Kodak Elite; both are 100 ISO.
|>
|> For landscapes/nature, the *BIG NEWS* is that Fuji has a brand new
|> transparency film called *Provia 100F (RDP III)* which is *the most
|> grainless film ever made*.  RMS granularity index = 8!: Velvia's &
|> Kodachrome 25 = 9.  It is also said to be extremely pushable: up to 2
|> stops! with little efect on color and tone.  I am still awaiting my
|> first brick of this material from B&H.  Undoubtedly, Fuji is going to
|> incorporate the new "Super-Fine Crystal" emulsion technology employed
|> in Provia 100F into all their professional slide films, including
|> Velvia, for even sharper slide films.
|>
|> I strongly suspect Kodak is trying to cook up a response to all this,
|> as evidenced by their very recent cancellation of their Kodachrome 25
|> & 64 lines.
|>
|> When the film giants slug it out, photographers win! ;-D
|>
|> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
|> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
|> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
|
|
|
|< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
|< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
|< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
|


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz