Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Super Telephoto

Subject: Re: [OM] Super Telephoto
From: gma <gma@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 11:36:30 -0700
Ingemar Uvhagen wrote:
> 
> gma wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > and compare the results for the 180/2 to those for the 180/2.8.
> 
> Good you brought it up George ("gma") as my next question about lenses is:
> Is the 180/2.8 really as bad as the test shows? I mean, VL (very low) in 
> contrast
> at corner and not too good at center either... Can the test result be trusted?
> Therefore as usual, if any of you list members have the 180/2.8, tell me (us?)
> what you think of it. In my future plan I had in mind to buy a Zuiko 180/2.8. 
> But
> if it is that bad, what is then the point in buying it?
> 
> --
> Regards/
>   Ingemar Uvhagen
>   Gislaved, Sweden
> 

-- 

I wonder the same things.  I need that focal length but am hesitating to
buy the 2.8 because it just doesn't have the usual stellar Zuiko
reputation.  Course finding a 2.0 might be like a needle in a haystack.


george  :>)

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz