> Accelerating expansion confirmed experimentally many times with more than one
> method. Saul Perlmutter from Moose's neck of the woods at Berkeley,
> received a Nobel in 2011---Type 1A supernova are "standard candles" and red
> shifted more the further away. Repellant force is Dark Energy which is only
> known at this point by the influence on other bodies. This is not in the SM
> and new physics is required for a complete explanation. Doesn't nullify the
> observation.
I don't question the observation, just the conclusions.
Most of the accelerating expansion theory is based on red shift and a
presumption of the existence of dark matter/energy/chocolate. Our math
is wrong, so we invent invisible things to fix our math. Sorry, I'm
just a pleb here and can't make sense of the mumble-jumble inventions
and fuzzy logic to blindly trust that we're not completely whacked out
on this whole thing. The idea of an accelerating universe runs counter
to the theory of an event horizon. The force that gives the appearance
of an accelerating universe is the same force that creates an event
horizon. The speed of light is constant, except when acted upon by
gravity as well as speed and direction of the source and observer.
Assumptions about accelerating expansion using red shift is based on
same speed of growth of the universe at time of the big bang or during
the "early years". The farthest objects have the greatest red shift,
which is explained by the Doppler Effect. However, the exact same
thing could be generally explained by saying that the farthest objects
had the greatest speed initial speed and have travelled the farthest.
The red shift is not a function of increasing speed, but of the speed
they've been travelling at in order to get as far as they have.
> So it seems the Universe will end in ice and not fire if all proceeds as
> measured. The BIG RIP ---when all is near absolute zero and all particles
> very far apart. I can see the AG descendants complaining it takes 750 years
> to take one photo due to photon shortage---until they get the Mark II Big Rip
> cam which can do so in 250 years.
Not to worry, We'll have cameras with an ISO of
3.4028236692093846346337460743177e+102
I heard that Canon is already planning on putting it in the 5D Mk
IVXCMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM and Moose has one on order.
AG (flat earth) Schnozz
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|