At 3/19/2021 11:03 AM, Ken wrote:
>> A silly question:
>> How much of the perceived result or lack of result is a function of the
>> monitor used to display the images? (And, for that matter, the printer
>> used if hard-copy) Things like HD or dynamic range or ... whatiever.
>
>That's not a silly question at all. But I think I'm OK in this because
>I'm looking at it on two different monitors and deep into pixel
>peeping. I'm figuring out what is different. However, odd thing. In
>another test I'm not seeing any difference between the enhance and the
>straight. Me thinks there is a functional bug with the software.
>Sometimes the Enhance Details enhances details, other times it
>doesn't. I am not finding the pattern this morning.
>
>Weird. More to follow.
>
>I'm copying files this morning to my PC drive for other efforts there.
>But I've been learning lots this week.
I write a lot of software. It is impossible to write bug free code.
There are so many use cases and sequence of events it is too
hard to create that many regression tests.
And it is always the case a user will find something. Latest PS update
I tried to use the lasso tool and when I hit the last point to create
the selection, PS turned it into an ellipse. And still does.
Software hell - WayneS
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|