On 3/19/2021 11:03 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
A silly question:
How much of the perceived result or lack of result is a function of the
monitor used to display the images? (And, for that matter, the printer
used if hard-copy) Things like HD or dynamic range or ... whatiever.
That's not a silly question at all. But I think I'm OK in this because
I'm looking at it on two different monitors and deep into pixel
peeping. I'm figuring out what is different. However, odd thing. In
another test I'm not seeing any difference between the enhance and the
straight.
That's all I've (not) seen.
Me thinks there is a functional bug with the software.
Sometimes the Enhance Details enhances details, other times it
doesn't. I am not finding the pattern this morning.
It always does something, in the magnified Preview Window, but it's really, really subtle, and i find it hard to say
it's an improvement. Then @ 100%, there's no visible difference..
Weird.
Indeed.
Un Enhanced Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|