I understand why you're so fit Jim.
I unfortunately gave up bodybuilding a couple of years ago ;-)
Keep them swinging :-)
Amities
Ph
Le 6 janv. 2016 à 22:33, Jim Nichols <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> Mike and Philippe,
>
> I picked up a 135/3.5 in M42 mount when I was using a Spotmatic, and still
> have it. I mount it on my Oly E-510 and use it as a "lightweight 270mm" for
> skydivers and airplanes on the runway at some distance from me. It is a
> fairly sharp lens, and renders colors in a manner that I like. At present,
> it is "permanently" attached to the E-510.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
>
> On 1/6/2016 2:50 PM, Philippe wrote:
>> Le 6 janv. 2016 à 21:40, Mike Lazzari <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>>
>>> My first camera as an "adult", i.e. I paid for it with money that I earned,
>>> was a Spotmatic + 28/3.5 +135/3.5. Those lenses were smaller than the
>>> Zuikos of the same FL which I picked up with my OM1 after selling the Pentax
>> Followed the same route and had the same lenses, but can't entirely agree -
>> the 135's barrel was massive. And it was heavy as lead, not speaking of the
>> ultra slow 42mm thread, my reason for the change. The 28mm which I sold last
>> year only, was cute indeed.
>>
>>> and they were at least as sharp.
>> Or nearly, but the Pentax body was clunky and much larger. Can still hear
>> the slap and bounce of the mirror.
>>
>> Amities
>> Philippe, a former owner of Spotmatic F, ESII, and OM2n.
>>
>>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|