I’m now on the LRCC and PSCC subscription iterations, and am shooting
exclusively with Fuji X-100s, and I _think_, though I’m too lazy to do much—if
any—research, that the Immortal Ones at Adobe have Graciously Accepted that
Fuji is the Real Thing. I have had no complaints when processing X-100s files
through LR and PS. I have noted that my first step in the post-processing flow
is to drop all the way to the bottom of the development tool panel and fiddle
with the Camera Calibration module. I seem to get better results when using
Fuji film emulation settings than Adobe Standard.
Or, put another way, because my brain works the way it does, I believe that
Life’s Too Short to Putz Around on DPReview. <g>
—Bob Whitmire
Certified Neanderthal
On Jun 6, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> They are, however, different (which wouldn't have stopped me), and a fair
> number of users who shoot Raw have reported difficulties getting the results
> they want with Adobe and/or the SilkyPix converter Fuji provides. That has
> led many off into the use of multiple software packages to get the results
> they like.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|