Thanks a lot, Ken and Joel ...
For some reason I can't recall now, I overlooked Miller's and was
processing E6 at Dwayne's.
Not bad at all, but I don't like the old cardboard frames - and I do
need my slides to be mounted.
I've also found an astonishing increase of air-mail shipping cost.
Cost might have been the reason why I forgot Miller's ...
Fernando.
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> With the original, we may still have
> "meaning" to the interpretation. Meaning and memory. The follow up
> version has less emotional attachment.
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:01 PM, DZDub <jdubikins@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It is my understanding that any digital capture (and a scan is simply a
> digital capture of a real analog photograph) has soft edges.
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The Analog to Digital and then the Digital to Analog process of
> imaging has a distinct flaw in the area of aliasing. When you scan
> film, you get "dot gain" as a result. And then when you output to
> inkjet you get "dot gain" again. If there is any grain or noise in the
> image, this is amplified. The above identified process helps eliminate
> most of the grain dot gain involved which equalizes film scans (of
> good quality low-ISO transparency films) with digital camera files.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|