Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] ()M) A question of ethics

Subject: Re: [OM] ()M) A question of ethics
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 14:18:16 -0500
Well I was obviously wrong about you quoting 6x17" as a print size 
rather than a ratio and Ken said.  450-600mm equates (roughly) to 
18-24".  I assume that's the long side and that a 6x17 ratio would be 
about 6-8" on the short side.  That would be a print magnification of 
about 7-10X a 6x17cm negative.  Is that about right?

Chuck Norcutt


On 2/4/2014 9:16 AM, bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Some DID buy 6 x 17 format, of which I had none.
>
> Size? 6 x
> 17, I'm thinking of from 450 to 600 mm. You convert; I'm too tired.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz