Le 21 déc. 13 à 18:32, Chuck Norcutt a écrit :
> Well, you may call it 24x36 but the data tells me it's still only
> 2000x1431 pixels or less than 3Mp. That's less than 10% of the pixels
> this camera is capable of producing.
???
They're all there, or am I simply mistaken in my math?
If not, where have they gone?
OTT 24x36 is the format, some call it 35mm, others FX, etc.
It is sometimes also called FF (full frame) which doesn't mean
anything on a technical plane - my L1 was and still is FF for its
lenses, and so is an S2 with its own, or a Rebel with its etc .
Amities
Philippe
> So, yes, it's inadequate to judge
> the image quality of a 36MP full-frame camera.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> __________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|