I'm just wondering why Tina (sorry for thr 3rd person Tina) is editing pix
(that is the case no?) on a laptop. I don't do that unless I have no choice. If
the screen is a couple of defrees off what you were doing last time, the
ambient lighting has changed, etc., then the image looks different. I'd rather
have a static workstation and I do, in two places - and a little MacAir for all
the other on the move stuff. And a desktop machine is usually cheaper to build
and option up and attach big stuff to and....
How much was the MacTub going to cost?
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.soultheft.com
Author/Publisher: The SLR Compendium - http://www.blurb.com/books/3732813
On 11/06/2013, at 5:42 PM, SwissPace wrote:
> I will say that its not the best for some BUT for Tina who admits to
> being non technical and wanting a machine with warranty etc.. then I
> honestly think that for her it would be worth moving to a mac, and even
> better if she could wait for the new mac pro and os maverick.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|