But I do like the shot overall.
Chuck Norcutt
On 1/11/2011 12:49 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> I don't, Chuck. The background looks fine to me.
>
> But I'm happy to take it as a difference in appreciation :-)
>
> Chris
>
> On 11 Jan 2011, at 16:06, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>> Chuck's opinion is that a blown out "unimportant background" will
>> suddenly become important since it's blown out. Keeping the unimportant
>> background unimportant should be one of the goals of the photograph.
>> That's also why I consider the edgy bokeh to be a problem as well.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> On 1/11/2011 7:38 AM, Brian Swale wrote:
>> the "powder Puff plant;
>>> my preference would have been to expose correctly on the flower ( had I
>>> noticed the problem at the time, which is doubtful), and let the unimportant
>>> background blow out. The bokeh there isn't much of a problem.
>> --
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|