Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] (OT) G12

Subject: Re: [OM] (OT) G12
From: John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:42:58 -0300
We should wait and see how many people weigh in and lend support for Dawid's 
hypothesis.

Meanwhile I'm feeling very civilized.

jh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Barker" <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] (OT) G12


> Do try and behave in a civilised fashion, John.  Dawid, was trying to 
> answer your question.
>
> Chris
>
> On 25 Oct 2010, at 12:07, John Hudson wrote:
>
>>> If you throw certain possibilities of image "aesthetics" out of the
>>> window (such
>>> as shallow DOF, very wide or narrow angles of view, etc) it is my
>>> opinion (and
>>> I hate to say this, since I won't touch the little thing...) that a
>>> G12 will
>>> yield an infinitely cleaner printed image at large-ish sizes, than
>>> almost any
>>> film Olympus OM shot.
>>
>> This is the biggest piece of hogwash I have ever, repeat ever, read on 
>> this
>> internet discussion list.
>
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz