Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] One Roll, One Lens, One Hour

Subject: Re: [OM] One Roll, One Lens, One Hour
From: "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:48:45 +0800
50/3.5 is one of my favourite lens especially good for family portrait. 
Although some complain about the bokeh but I found most of the OOF 
background are quite pleasing. The lens gives bright view with the OM bodies 
and focusing is very easy, it looks more like a F2.8 rather than a F3.5 (I'm 
looking through my OM3 with Minolta Acute Matte focusing screen installed), 
it is sharp with pleasing color.

I had almost all versions of 50mms including the 55/1.2 and I'm still having 
two 50/1.4s, a 50/2 macro and 50/3.5 macro. I don't mind only having the 
50/3.5 as the only 50mm, I can take my 24/2 or 28/2 in case I need low light 
street work.

C.H.Ling


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Crawford" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> As cheap as 50/1.8 lenses are I'd have kept it. I have 3 of them, though 
> one
> needs work for gummy aperture blades. I don't think I could live with a 
> slow
> macro as my only 50.
>
>
> -- 
> Chris Crawford
> Photography & Graphic Design
> Fort Wayne, Indiana
>
> http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My portfolio
>
> http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My latest work!
>
> http://www.plumpatrin.com  Something the world NEEDS.
>
>
>
> On 11/29/08 11:08 PM, "Ken Norton" <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Congratulations.  I'm so tied to post-processing these days that I'm not
>>> sure I could ever present something straight out of the camera today.
>>> But I should try.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks. I'm not sure which was actually scarier:  Doing the street
>> photography or posting the unedited results.  There was a huge temptation 
>> to
>> convert them to B&W. But that would have violated a couple rules of this
>> project.  B&W is not a crutch to poor photography. Although a few of 
>> those
>> shots definitely could have been improved had they been B&W.
>>
>> As to the lens selection, well, I was going to use the 35/2.8, but 
>> decided
>> to limit myself to a more "common" focal length. Why the macro?  Well,
>> because the 50/1.8 went to live with somebody else.
>>
>> Ken

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz