| Subject: | [OM] Re: 420 and 25/2.8 |
|---|---|
| From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:50:06 +1000 |
You forgot the 1200mm. :-) I understand that the non-L wides aren't too good but the 85/1.8 and 100/2 excellent and 135/2L rather special. Haven't heard much on the new 200/2 yet. Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 18/07/2008, at 12:51 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote: > Then perhaps you're on the wrong system. I've never tallied the > Canyon > primes before but decided to take a look. Here's what's available. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: IMG: Cricket team photos, Andrew Fildes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] AVG, Brian Gray |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: 420 and 25/2.8, C.H.Ling |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: 420 and 25/2.8, Chuck Norcutt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |