Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: 420 and 25/2.8

Subject: [OM] Re: 420 and 25/2.8
From: "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:47:28 +0800
If "good" also means compact and fast then nothing like the F2 OM Zuikos. 
IMO F2 is the best compromise between price, size and speed, there is only a 
few from Canyon.

C.H.Ling - still waiting for a good digital FF body for his 21/2, 24/2, 
28/2, 35/2, 40/2, 50/2, 85/2, 90/2, 100/2....

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Then perhaps you're on the wrong system.  I've never tallied the Canyon
> primes before but decided to take a look.  Here's what's available.
>
> 14/2.8
> 15/2.8 fisheye
> 20/2.8
> 24/1.4 and 2.8
> 24/3.5 tilt/shift
> 28/1.8 and 2.8
> 35/1.4 and 2
>
> 45/2.8 tilt/shift
> 50/1.2, 1.4 and 1.8
> 50/2.5 macro
> 60/2.8 macro (EFS only)
> 65/2.8 macro
> 85/1.2 and 1.8
> 90/2.8 tilt/shift
> 100/2
> 100/2.8 macro
> 135/2 and 2.8
> 180/3.5 macro
> 200/2 and 2.8
> 300/2.8 and 4
>
> 400/2.8, 4 and 5.6
> 500/4
> 600/4
> 800/5.6
>
> If my counting is correct that's 35 primes with only 7 of them slower
> than f/2.8.  Those that are slower than f/2.8, well I think you see the
> reasons.  If you add Sigma to the list you get another 14 to choose
> from.  I assume Nikon and Pentax have the same story.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> bs.pearce@xxxxxxx wrote:
>


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz