Read my other post. He lied to you about the Nikon lens. It is a poor
lens and is 10 years older than the Canon lens. And his pictures do
not really prove anything. I am not saying that there is not an
advantage to a larger format, but neither his images nor his
discussion is enlightening, as usual.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On / April 19, 2008 CE, at 6:56 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> But the point was exquisitely simple. The 5D with its large sensor
> made
> a significantly (not just a little) better image than the smaller
> sensor
> camera even when the smaller sensor camera had one of the best lenses
> Nikon offers. That's all. I think the point was made. Calling him
> whatever doesn't change the data.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|