ML Archiv: [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and res

Subject:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution
From:	Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 20 Apr 2008 08:11:13 +1000

Yeah, so what exactly is he doing wrong? :-)
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



On 20/04/2008, at 2:17 AM, Winsor Crosby wrote:

> I am afraid Mr. Rockwell's opinions are not highly prized in most
> quarters. "Reviews" of cameras he has not seen, lack of care in his
> methods, and outrageous hyperbole are the the usual criticisms.



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, (continued) [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Michael Wong [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, C.H.Ling [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, C.H.Ling [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Wayne Harridge [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Gordon Ross [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes <= [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Bill Pearce [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Bill Pearce [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Leandro DUTRA [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Larry [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Gordon Ross

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: OM lens mount to film plane distance, Moose
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: OM lens mount to film plane distance, Moose
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Gordon Ross
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Bill Pearce
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]