I looked and looked, but decided to take his word for it that the
B9180 was better. Something I read somewhere else said that the
differences between the HP, Canon, and Epson were there, but very
subtle. I suspect that is the whole story.
I am kind of confused on the color calibration feature. I may have
misunderstood, but it seemed a wonderful tool for using any kind of
paper in it without a profile. Some other review said to beware that
it did not replace profiles. If it is only for calibrating after
replacing a head then it seems to be of limited utility.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Jan 6, 2007, at 2:42 PM, Moose wrote:
> I reread Victor's reviews of it and the B9180 carefully and looked at
> his samples side by side. I'm not sure which I would like in person
> after spending some time with them, but I'm sure it would be a near
> thing. And the Epson solution to pigment inks and glossy paper
> seems the
> best to date. Also, the possible longevity advantage of the HP is
> balanced against size, weight and price, all of which are of some
> importance to me.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|