Check these two:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&s
ku=277215&is=USA&addedTroughType=search
Nikon branded
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&s
ku=423719&is=USA&addedTroughType=search
Tamron branded
This is a model mentioned in an earlier post and to quote Chuck 'sure do
look like the same lenses to me'
Dan S.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Winsor Crosby
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 5:04 PM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Re: Olympus USA says no to E-400?
>
>
> I did not say it did not happen at all. It may be for small
> or failing manufacturer like Minolta, as I said. I remember
> the famous Tokina lens that was purchased from Angenieux. I
> would still be very surprised by a Nikon or Canon having its
> lenses designed and built by Tamron or having a Tamron lens
> repackaged for them with their identifying marks.
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, CA
> USA
>
>
> On Sep 18, 2006, at 1:16 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
> > I guess the Mynolta 17-35/2.8-4 is the one that used to
> catch my eye.
> > Noticed when I was seriously thinking about Mynolta before
> its demise.
> > <http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?
> > O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=353933&is=USA&addedTroughType=search>
> > Here's the Tamron in Mynolta mount
> > <http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?
> > O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=303167&is=REG&addedTroughType=search>
> > and also availble for Canyon, Nykon and Pintax. Sure do
> look like the
> > same lenses to me.
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|