Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Olympus USA says no to E-400?

Subject: [OM] Re: Olympus USA says no to E-400?
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:03:33 -0700
I did not say it did not happen at all. It may be for small or  
failing manufacturer like Minolta, as I said. I remember the famous  
Tokina lens that was purchased from Angenieux. I would still be very  
surprised by a Nikon or Canon having its lenses designed and built by  
Tamron or having a Tamron lens repackaged for them with their  
identifying marks.


Winsor
Long Beach, CA
USA


On Sep 18, 2006, at 1:16 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:

> I guess the Mynolta 17-35/2.8-4 is the one that used to catch my eye.
> Noticed when I was seriously thinking about Mynolta before its demise.
> <http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home? 
> O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=353933&is=USA&addedTroughType=search>
> Here's the Tamron in Mynolta mount
> <http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home? 
> O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=303167&is=REG&addedTroughType=search>
> and also availble for Canyon, Nykon and Pintax.  Sure do look like the
> same lenses to me.


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz