Don't even get me started about the over saturation of most images in
contemporary magazines. The problem started in advertising and has
spread to the editorial pages. Looks to me like Velvia on acid.
Even National Geographic went through some nasty growing pains when
they switched to digital printing of the magazine. I sent an email
asking, essentially, "What's the deal?" Their response was along the
lines of, "We know, we know. We're working on it!" I let my
membership lapse (for other reasons) and have no idea how they're
doing now.
ScottGee1
On 9/14/06, AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
SNIP!
> I think the biggest problem with Sports Illustrated is that
> they're like a child with a new toy and apply noise reduction
> and selective blurring to the images in ways that make me want
> to barf. JPEG artifacts after the NR process look like worms
> all over the images. This has nothing to do with scaling, but
> everything to do with moronic editing and pre-press.
>
> AG
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|