Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: OT: "Its all Bush's fault"

Subject: [OM] Re: OT: "Its all Bush's fault"
From: "John Hermanson" <omtech@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:56:59 -0400
It's already established that she was "covert".  Rove's lawyers admitted he 
did it.

John Hermanson
Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
21 South Lane, Huntington, NY 11743
631-424-2121  |  omtech@xxxxxxxxx
              www.zuiko.com
Factory Trained OM Service since 1977
__________________________________
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 3:25 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: OT: "Its all Bush's fault"


>
>
> Winsor Crosby wrote:
>> But if you reveal their names you will have committed a crime.
>
> There are a number of caveats wrapped around this law that will make it
> very tough to prove, not the least of which is that she was a "covert"
> agent.
>
>>
>> Rove's attorney admitted to the press that Rove had revealed Wilson's
>> wife was a CIA agent and that she was in a position to suggest her
>> husband. Not only that, the following day Novak revealed the name of
>> her cover corporation which compromised the whole intelligence
>> operation she was running having to do with weapons of mass destruction.
>>
>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/10/
>> AR2005071001000.html
>>
> To quote your own source (above):
> "Rove apparently told Cooper that it was "Wilson's wife, who apparently
> works at the agency on [weapons of mass destruction] issues who
> authorized the trip," according to a story in Newsweek's July 18 issue."
>
> I'm afraid the phrase "who apparently works at the agency" is a bit far
> removed from "covert agent".
>
>> And just a question. If you really doubt this why would Bush have not
>> been able to uncover the leak in two years in the investigation he
>> pledged to do? And why would he raise the burden of proof before he
>> would do something about it? Why would Scott McClellan lie to the
>> press about Rove's involvement at one point and then stonewall after
>> that?
>
> I don't believe Carl Rove is a nice guy but neither do I believe the
> "charges" are anywhere close to being proven.  In fact, only the press
> has announced "charges".  The prosecutor has the case and hasn't said
> anything.  If he's got somthing solid let him make it stick.  I'll
> support him.
>
> ps:  Scott Mclellan is the press secretary.  He can't "lie to the press"
> because he hasn't a clue about what's really going on whether the
> Repbulicans are guilty or not.  No press secretary is in the inner
> circle.  He just says what he's told as best he can.  Tough job.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>>
>> Winsor
>> Long Beach, California, USA
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 16, 2005, at 7:59 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>
>>
>>>When I lived in Northern Virginia I had two neighbors who worked at
>>>the
>>>CIA and three at the FBI.  There was never any secret about where they
>>>worked, only about exactly what they did or how well they did it.
>>
>>
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz