Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...)

Subject: [OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...)
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:15:59 -0700
As I was waiting for the guy to fill out the paperwork when I bought  
my D100(E-1 was still just a two year old promise), I handled a  
Pentax which had just come out and I almost cancelled the sale. I had  
to quickly remind myself of the reasons for getting the D100. I  
thought the Pentax was a sweet little camera and very easy to pick up  
and take a few pictures without consulting a manual. Not hard at all.  
It is a little bigger than the OM and about the same weight. I found  
the Canons which are a little bigger to be more ergonomically  
strange, but maybe that is just me.



Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA




On Jul 27, 2005, at 11:50 AM, R.Jackson wrote:

>
> I read something recently...on Steve's maybe? I don't
> recall...anyway, the reviewer was talking about some new digibox and
> said that it's not as small and difficult to manage as the Pentax
> *ist. He went on to say that at some point smaller becomes more
> difficult to use in his opinion. I kept thinking, "Yeah, a Minox is
> kind of a hassle..." but to me the Pentax is about the closest any of
> the digitals come to being a good Oly replacement. And even then...


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz