Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...)

Subject: [OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...)
From: Der Eiserne Reiter <ferider@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
Not so tiny/pancake at f2.

--- Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> And there is the Pentax *IST DS or DL with their 43mm 1.9. If  
> concerned with a similar angle of view as the Oly with pancake, every  
> manufacturer makes a 28mm lens that is equivalent in view about 40mm  
> on a digital. The low priced Canon digital SLRs are both about the  
> same size as an OM. You could even plunk a tiny Oly 21mm on an E-300  
> with an adaptor.
> 
> 
> 
> Winsor
> Long Beach, California, USA
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 27, 2005, at 10:54 AM, Daniel Sepke wrote:
> 
> > The closest you'll get size wise is the Epson R-D1 and VC 35/2.5  
> > pancake. Of
> > course not in everyone's price bracket and it is a RF camera. Close  
> > but....
> >
> > Dan S.
> >
> > From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On  
> > Behalf
> > Of R.Jackson
> > Subject: [OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...)
> >
> > It would be nice to have something comparable to an OM with a pancake
> > lens in the digital marketplace.
> 
> 
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz