| Subject: | [OM] Re: BW Paper revisited part II |
|---|---|
| From: | AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Oct 2004 20:40:12 -0700 (PDT) |
> I used to use Panatomic X then it was
> dropped. Then I went to using Agfa 25. Then it was Pan F. I
> also used
> Tech Pan for a while. All now gone... So it looks like I'll
> be settling on Tmax100 and Tri-X.
Yikes! I'm going to suggest that you convert to Kodak BW 400.
I'd hate for your "black cloud" nature cause the discontinuance
of Tmax100 or Tri-X. <smile>
> I can forsee the day in
> the future when making a silver print will be considered an
> 'alternative' process.
I hate to say it, but it's already there. I challenge you to
find any commercial lab offering silver-gelatin prints. I may
be one of only a handful in the entire state and the only one
offering fiber prints. One of those labs is planning to
completely shutdown all B&W processing at the end of this year.
AG
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Breakfast in the hut., Moose |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] OT: Kodak and IBM jointly develope CMOS imagers., Tim Hughes |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: BW Paper revisited part II, Andrew McPhee |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: BW Paper revisited part II, Andrew McPhee |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |