AG Schnozz schrieb:
> Specific lenses of interest:
> 50/3.5 100/2.8
those two should be nice. My personal experience is limited to 2/90,
2.8/180 (both nice) and 4,5/300 (hardly used, because with that length
AF would be nice..., it's possible but more prone to light haze in the
air dampening the contrast)
> 200/4
Worth a try, I guess.
With the teles I do find it a little bothersome that once you have
focussed and closed to dewired f-stop, you have no control if your
object is moving.
BTW, rumour is getting louder that there will be a 45-150mm f2,8-3,5
lens for about 300 Euro to go mainly with the new E300 (Evolt or
whatsoever). But of course that's digital. Anyhow it's a lot cheaper
than the excellent 50-200 and maybe a solution for people (like me) that
would rather wait or save for a prime.
> Another question: Automatic dust removal. Would any of you with
> multiple DSLR experience give me a weighting on this feature? Is it
> hype or is it a "cat's meow" feature?
As far as I've heard and seen from a lot of pros with both Canon and E-1
setup, it's a blessing :)
> Another another question: Noise level. I know what the
> "specifications" say, but they don't describe the quality of the
> sound. Does the E-1 sound quiet? Can you feel the shutter/mirror
> slap?
It *really is quiet and has a very pleasant sound. Sort of *ssshhhhlbb*
:)) Pressure point is very subtle.
Just my 2 eurocents...
have a nice day
:Doro
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|