Here are two scans with and without ICE with my N*kon 4000ED at 4000DPI:
http://www.accura.com.hk/P1-ICE.jpg
http://www.accura.com.hk/P1-ICE-OFF.jpg
I don't think there is noticeable lost of details, make a slight sharpen on
the ICE one will make it equal or better then the one without ICE.
BTW, I had a 2700dpi N*kon (LS2000) before, the 4000dpi one makes a big
different, you should try one.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> I've never used ICE. However, samples on the web of scans of the same
> image on the same scanner with and without it showed a definite, if
> sublte softening of the image. That's one reason I bought a scanner that
> doesn't have it and has a light source that doesn't tend to accentuate
> dust and other flaws. Maybe that's at least one reason why my upsampled
> 2700dpi scan seemed competitive in sharpness and detail to your 5400dpi
> scan of an iris? Have you tried with and without ICE in detail
> comparison for sharpness and detail?
>
> Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
