| Subject: | [OM] Re: night time conundrums |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:17:25 -0800 |
I pretty much agree with Piers. I do think it's interesting proof that one may need a lens hood at night too! Particularly with the 3.6, as it has such a good one. Moose james@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >I took several night shots on my last roll of film and a couple of them >have things on them that I can't explain. The first is flare related >and the second a strange apparition in the sky: > > The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Unbelievable Conversion on OM 2S, Gordon J. Ross |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: external ambient/flash/reflected Lightmeters, Gordon J. Ross |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: night time conundrums, Rob Harrison |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: night time conundrums, James Royall |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |