Moose, in spite of most my lenses are performing very well on the 10D but I
have to add that the wide angle lenses do suffer resolution drop at the
edges or corners, even my 17-40L lens from C*non do the same.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I suppose that's one possible reason. If Oly is not being disingenuous,
> it's about the only reason that makes sense. B.D. loves his E-1 and
> argues that Oly must be right, but has no practical experience with OM
> lenses on the E-1. Winsor's point below certainly makes sense to me.
> What is one to believe?
>
> I've been keeping my mouth shut in this discussion, but have one
> practical thing to say. C.H. is known to me and others as a meticulous
> photographer and technician who is about as fussy about lens performance
> as anyone here, certainly more so than I. He's the one who has posted
> microscope pics of film to make lens resolution comparisons and clear
> samples of coma in the 180/2.8, etc. And he has been very happy with OM
> lenses on his 10D. If he says the results are technically excellent, I
> tend to believe it. So OM lenses can perform very well with a digital
> sensor of roughly the same size and resolution as the E-1. Does CCD vs.
> CMOS make a difference?
>
> Moose
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|