On Jan 17, 2004, at 2:17 PM, Moose wrote:
> C.H. is known to me and others as a meticulous
> photographer and technician who is about as fussy about lens
> performance
> as anyone here, certainly more so than I. He's the one who has posted
> microscope pics of film to make lens resolution comparisons and clear
> samples of coma in the 180/2.8, etc. And he has been very happy with OM
> lenses on his 10D. If he says the results are technically excellent, I
> tend to believe it. So OM lenses can perform very well with a digital
> sensor of roughly the same size and resolution as the E-1. Does CCD vs.
> CMOS make a difference?
>
Good point. I have a lot of respect for his judgment too. I don't think
CCD vs. CMOS makes any difference as far lens performance is concerned.
Canon seems to have been able to get the most noise free performance by
a small margin out of a CMOS.
Winsor
Long Beach, California
USA
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|