Doro,
I posited the CD vs LP/analogue analogy over on DPreview, and got ripped for
it. I stand by what I said, but I'm waiting for flack her now that you have
thrown down the gauntlet! Now, you have more credibility than I, as you are a
musician, I just a music-lover with an audio budget lower than I wish. My
turntable is kick-ass, but needs a good setup from a competent technician.
Slainte,
Earl
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 11/5/2003 at 1:53 AM Dorothée Rapp wrote:
>Jeff Keller schrieb:
>
>> Maybe no new miracles however the lens optimization priorities could be
>> different ... BUT it is pretty hard to believe that NONE of the old
>> Zuikos would give satisfying images.
>
>I don't think it was a bad idea to design new - and lighter - lenses.
>And for instance the 50-200 seems to perform *very well indeed, and the
>macro as well, and many more lenses to come maybe.
>On the other hand, I feel that everything is getting complicated only to
>make up for the deficiencies of todays sensors. Everything has by design
>to be interpolated (right word?) and corrected..as long as Foveon
>doesn't really work out. So - I don't know. It's maybe like in music.
>When recording went digital, it was (and still is) a long way to regain
>the immediate effect a very good analog recording can transport to our
>ears and souls.
>
>just my 2 Eurocents...
>
>:Doro
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|