Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] E-1 lenses resolution vs. conventional lenses - fact or hype?

Subject: Re: [OM] E-1 lenses resolution vs. conventional lenses - fact or hype?
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:05:48 -0400
Before you say that Olympus hasn't made a decent viewfinder, I suggest
you actually pickup an E-1 and try focusing with it; you will be shocked
at what you see - it's full frame, bright and contrasty - enough so that
I can manually focus in low light, without the aid of a rangefinder in
the center (none of the digital cameras have that, unfortunately.)

To say that the image is small really makes less than no sense - it's
full frame, and magnified to whatever 35 mm equivalent you're using - so
the image looks no smaller than the image you see in your Omwhatever, or
the image I would see in a Nikon f100 using the equivalent focal length.

Try it before you comment on it.

B. D.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of AG Schnozz
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 2:47 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] E-1 lenses resolution vs. conventional lenses - fact
or hype?


>I'd suggest that the adapter would be a way to get
>Zuikoholics into the tent, and once there, most people would
>eventually buy one or more of the E-1 lenses.

Well, DUH!

I don't think there are too many of us on this list that have just ONE
lens for our OMs.  We'll be foregoing food and shelter to buy the next
E-series lens.

I'm still pretty torn on this one.  I like the concept of the E-1, but
the viewfinder image is too small and the focus screen isn't really
meant to focus on.  An OM it ain't.  Olympus hasn't made a decent
viewfinder in any new camera design for a dozen years.

I want a "no-excuses" "no-compromise" camera.  Why should I go
backwards?  The problem here is that our OMs date back to the heyday of
SLR design.  Other than the F5 and EOS-1N, SLR design has gone
backwards.  Now, with digital, it has gone REALLY backwards.

Sure, it's got fancy-dancy digital features, and improved sensors,
storage-media and battery life.  But when it comes down to the nuts and
bolts of it, ANY camera does 900f photography well.  It's the
remaining 10% that requires a tool that doesn't fight you.  The OM, it
ain't.

AG

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz