In <v04220802bbac52871e42@[192.168.1.100]>, on 10/10/03
at 08:32 AM, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>Simply put, there are not enough of us Zuiks to matter in a photo market
>where the least significant digit is 100,000 cameras sold, and the
>internal debate at Olympus on production of an OM-E1 adapter probably
>turns on the likely profitability of such an adapter were it offered, and
>not on any possible effect on the larger market for the E1.
I sometimes wonder whether in these discussions there is ever a sense that
they owe something to long-term enthusiasts of the marque, even if
producing that adapter is done whilst earning little or no profit for the
item?
For that matter, is there *any* corporation that shows evidence of that
sense any more? Perhaps small businesses...
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
les clark / edgewater, nj / usa
-----------------------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|