Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Which slide scanner

Subject: Re: [OM] Which slide scanner
From: baysm@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
ICE does not work as WELL with Kodachrome. I have found that it WILL do a
fine job of removing defects with Kodachrome, however there is some
softening of the overall image.

Most of my slides are Kodachrome, so I have quite a bit of experience with
with scanning on the 4000 ED with ICE3, particularly with many older,
scratched, and damaged slides. If your making 11x17's or larger it might
not be acceptable. I have found that it works quite well for 8x10's and
smaller. I haven't tried it yet with B&W.

For a independent review check this link:

http://www.sphoto.com/techinfo/scs4000.html



> Also, ICE doesn't work with Kodachromes or B+W - the images are not
> infrared  transparent.
>
> If you have the money, the newish Minolta Multi does 4800 dpi.
> Otherwise, the  Canon FS4000 seems to be both fast and good.
>
> tOM
>
> On Monday, April 28, 2003 at 9:38
> Mark Dapoz <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2003 KB8CD@xxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks to all who contributed. I have done a bit of reading and
>> looking at scans. The problem in comparison of scans is that they
>> are not only done with different scanners, they are done by
>> different people. I had thought that ICE is nice, but you guys have
>> about convinced me it a requirement. Some of my slides are older
>> than my Olympus. My research was leading me toward the Coolscan.
>> Seems most of you agree.
>>
>> If you plan on scanning Kodachromes, you should run a test of the
>> scanner using a high contrast slide to see how it behaves.  I find the
>> Coolscan IV is very bad, it produces very blochy shadows and is
>> extremely flare prone. It doesn't matter whether ICE is on or off, and
>> the same results appear with both Nikonscan and Vuescan.  I've tried
>> the same test on several Coolscan IV's and they all show the same
>> problem.  I'm going to be sending my scanner back to Nikon to see what
>> they can do about it.  If Kodachrome is important to you, I wouldn't
>> recommend buying the Coolscan IV.
>>     -mark
> ---------
> 2003 Jun 28-30 in Ottawa:
> http://www.CanadianCameraConference.ca
> tOM Trottier, ICQ:57647974    http://abacurial.com
>       758 Albert St, Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7V8
>       +1 613 860-6633 fax:231-6115 N45.412 W75.714
> "The moment one gives close attention to anything,
> even a blade of grass, it becomes a mysterious,
> awesome, indescribably magnificent world in itself --
> Henry Miller, 1891-1980
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz