Joel,
Perhaps you would never use it, but I do. I've owned/used the SS4000,
SS4000+ and 4000ED. I kept the 4000ED because of the batch scan, but they
are all fine scanners. ICE, though, is incredible, at least in its latest
version (that's an important point, I believe only the latest Nikon and
Minolta have the latest version). When used in 'light' mode, it eliminates
virtually all dust and scratches with NO detectible softening.
My second biggest problem with the SS4000 was its dust problem.
Tom
> At 06:56 PM 4/26/2003 -0700, you wrote:
> >the ICE, ROC, or GEM. Whatever you get, make sure you get it with ICE,
> >it's indispensible.
>
> I have a Polaroid SS4000, hence no ICE, and have never missed it. I
> shouldn't be skeptical of something I've never used, and I think I would
> want ICE, or at least the option, if I were working on someone else's
film,
> but I firmly believe I wouldn't use it on my own.
>
> Anyway, "indispensable" is such a strong word when there are those who
live
> without that thing freely and willingly.
>
> Joel W.
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|