ML Archiv: Re: [OM] OM2S Fang

Subject:	Re: [OM] OM2S Fang
From:	Mark Marr-Lyon <markml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 23 Jun 2002 08:50:12 -0600

>>Is there something about the OM40 that makes it a better snapshot camera?
Moose wrote:
[many good reasons why the OM40/PC is so great snipped]
>You hadda ask ;-)

Hehe!  Thanks!  I guess I'll keep my eye out for one of these too :)

Mark Marr-Lyon

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] OM2S Fang, (continued) Re: [OM] OM2S Fang, T . Clausen Re: [OM] OM2S Fang, Bill Stanke Re: [OM] OM2S Fang, Mark Marr-Lyon Re: [OM] OM2S Fang, dreammoose Re: [OM] OM2S Fang/PC snapshot, Wayne Culberson Re: [OM] OM2S Fang/PC snapshot, dreammoose Re: [OM] OM2S Fang/PC snapshot, Wayne Culberson Re: [OM] OM2S Fang/PC snapshot, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] OM2S Fang, dreammoose Re: [OM] OM2S Fang, Mickey Trageser Re: [OM] OM2S Fang, Mark Marr-Lyon <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] 75-150 focus adjustment (was OM2S Fang), Mark Marr-Lyon
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] hmmm... what do you think?, Clayton Smith
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] OM2S Fang, Mickey Trageser
Next by Thread:	[OM] RE: exposure compensation failure, bsandyman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]